MRAssociates — Knowledge base
We provide the only free knowledge base in the UK dedicated to Supported Exempt Accommodation
In the same topic…
- contentBristol CC v AW [2009] UKUT 109 (AAC) (CH/200/2009)
- contentCH/1127/2008 and others
- contentCH/1289/2007
- contentCH/150/2007 and others - Interim Decision
- contentCH/150/2015 and others
- contentCH/1766/2010
- contentCH/2633/2008 - Interim Decision
- contentCH/2751/2007
- contentCH/2805/2007 - Interim Decision
- contentCH/3900/2005
- contentCH/4432/2006 and others - Interim decision
- contentCH/760/2008
- contentCH/779/2007 - Interim Decision
- contentCH/890/2009
- contentChorley BC v EM [2009] UKUT 108 (AAC) (CH/4432/2006 and others) - Final Decision
- contentChorley BC v IT [2009] UKUT 107 (AAC); [2010] AACR 2 (CH/150/2007) - Final Decision
- contentCSH/250/2014
- contentCSH/298/2011
- contentDW v Oxford CC [2012] UKUT 52 (AAC) (CH/1344/2011)
- contentEast Hertfordshire DC v KT [2009] UKUT 12 (AAC) (CH/2726/2008)
- contentR (S) v Social Security Commissioner, Secretary of State & Walsall MBC [2008] EWHC 3097 (Admin)
- contentR (S) v Social Security Commissioner, Secretary of State & Walsall MBC [2009] EWHC 2221 (Admin)
- contentR(H) 2/07
- contentR(H) 4/09 [CH/779/2007; CH/2805/2007; CH/1246/2007 & CH/1247/2007 (Reported as R(H) 6/08) - Final decision]
- contentR(H) 6/08 [CH/1246/2007 & Ch/1247/2007 - Interim Decision
- contentR(H) 7/07
- contentSalford CC v PF [2009] UKUT 150 (AAC) (CH/577/2009 & others)
- contentWirral BC v MF [2013] UKUT 291 (AAC); [2014] AACR 12 (CH/1528/2012)
CH/2633/2008 - Final Decision
Case law | |
Case law date | |
Commission/Judge | Judge Turnbull |
Whether landlord (Golden Lane Housing Ltd) is providing housing-related support
This was the final decision in a case concerning accommodation that had been let to the claimant by Golden Lane Housing Ltd (“GLH”). In a brief decision Judge Turnbull decided to remit the case to a new tribunal in order to give the claimant’s advisers a fresh opportunity to “plug any holes in the evidence” in the light of his decision in CH/779/2007 and ors (reported as R(H) 4/09). Judge Turnbull refers to this as “the very long decision” which related to several GLH tenancies in Oxford, Sheffield and Hounslow. In that decision the Judge had concluded that GLH did not provide support to the tenants. The Judge said that there may well be reasons why the decision in the instant case could be different to the outcome in those cases, given that: (i) there was a different claimant; (ii) a later time period was involved; and (iii) there could be evidence as to the scope of GLH’s activities which was not before him in R(H) 4/09.